Digests
Top Posts
Did delegate fail to comply with Direction No 90 made under Section 499(1) Migration Act, 1958 (Cth)?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
Does "adverse material" in Section 162(3) of Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 (Vic) refer to proposed adverse comments or opinions in report, or evidentiary material upon which proposed adverse comments or opinions are based?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
Was delegate's decision affected by jurisdictional error by considering the offences committed by plaintiff when under 16 years of age notwithstanding Sections 85ZR and 85ZS of the Crimes Act, 1915 (Cth)?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
Was the Tribunal's decision in failing to engage in evaluative assessment of relevant mandatory considerations affected by jurisdictional error?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
When forming state of satisfaction whether "another reason" existed to revoke cancellation of respondent's visa, is the Minister required to personally read some or all of respondent's representations?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
Where application made by appellant's migration agent contained no statement of reasons for application, does non-compliance with requirement of Section 29(1)(c) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) result in invalidity?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
Where appellant refused to cooperate in administrative processes necessary to facilitate removal of appellant to Iran, did continuing detention of appellant exceed constitutional limitation identified in NZYQ?
  •  ·  YJ, Lim
  •  · 
The Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 – A Draconian Assault on Civil Liberties
The Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 – A Draconian Assault on Civil Liberties
The Erosion of Liberty: A Forensic and Constitutional Critique of the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026
The Erosion of Liberty: A Forensic and Constitutional Critique of the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026
Australia’s New “Hate & Extremism” Law Isn’t Coming For Them… It’s Coming For You
Australia’s New “Hate & Extremism” Law Isn’t Coming For Them… It’s Coming For You
When the State Tries to Define the Bible: Beale v State of Queensland and the Limits of Official Theology
When the State Tries to Define the Bible: Beale v State of Queensland and the Limits of Official Theology
One Oath Is Enough: High Court Restores a Conviction After Jurors Swore Their Separation Oath on Day One
One Oath Is Enough: High Court Restores a Conviction After Jurors Swore Their Separation Oath on Day One
709-720
SSL Certificates