Search by Keyword
Digests
Riva NSW Pty Limited v Mark A Fraser; Fraser v Riva (NSW) (No. 4) [2022] NSWSC 1624 (28 November 2022)
Riva NSW Pty Limited v Mark A Fraser; Fraser v Riva (NSW) (No. 4) [2022] NSWSC 1624 (28 November 2022)
  •  ·  FA Faj
  •  · 
Parties Dispute Basis of Indemnification
Parties Dispute Basis of Indemnification
Applicant Seeks Assessment of Costs
Applicant Seeks Assessment of Costs
Plaintiff Seeks Costs Against Defendant
Plaintiff Seeks Costs Against Defendant
Plaintiff Seeking for Costs Order Opposed by the Defendant
Plaintiff Seeking for Costs Order Opposed by the Defendant
Offers Relating to Cost Orders Opposed by the Plaintiff
Offers Relating to Cost Orders Opposed by the Plaintiff
Seven Network seeks Cost Orders of $152,156 against Kangaroo Court blogger Shane Dowling
Seven Network seeks Cost Orders of $152,156 against Kangaroo Court blogger Shane Dowling
Defendant Seeks Joint Liability of Plaintiff and Funder
Defendant Seeks Joint Liability of Plaintiff and Funder

Private

Access denied. This is private content.
DEFENDANT ASKS FOR INDEMNITY COSTS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AFTER THE LATTER REJECTED TWO SETTLEMENT OFFERS
DEFENDANT ASKS FOR INDEMNITY COSTS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AFTER THE LATTER REJECTED TWO SETTLEMENT OFFERS
APPLICANT’S SOLICITOR BEING ORDERED TO PAY FOR COST FOR INSTITUTING AN APPEAL THAT HAS NO REASONABLE PROSPECT OF SUCCESS
APPLICANT’S SOLICITOR BEING ORDERED TO PAY FOR COST FOR INSTITUTING AN APPEAL THAT HAS NO REASONABLE PROSPECT OF SUCCESS
LOSING PARTY FILES AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLEGING NEGLIGENCE OF COUNSEL
LOSING PARTY FILES AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS ALLEGING NEGLIGENCE OF COUNSEL
DEFENDANTS ASKS FOR INDEMNITY COST AGAINST PLAINTIFFS FOR UNREASONABLY REFUSING THEIR OFFERS
DEFENDANTS ASKS FOR INDEMNITY COST AGAINST PLAINTIFFS FOR UNREASONABLY REFUSING THEIR OFFERS
PLAINTIFF SEEKS FOR INDEMNITY COST AFTER SUCCESSFUL JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ON THE GROUND THAT THE BASIS OF THE DEFENDANT’S CLAIM IS BASED ON A SHAM TRANSACTION
PLAINTIFF SEEKS FOR INDEMNITY COST AFTER SUCCESSFUL JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ON THE GROUND THAT THE BASIS OF THE DEFENDANT’S CLAIM IS BASED ON A SHAM TRANSACTION
COUNSEL OF THE APPLICANTS SEEKS LIEN OVER THEIR APPLICANT’S COSTS ORDER JUDGMENT
COUNSEL OF THE APPLICANTS SEEKS LIEN OVER THEIR APPLICANT’S COSTS ORDER JUDGMENT
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION SEEKS THAT AN ORDER FOR COSTS SHOULD BE ON THE STANDARD COSTS BASIS AND NOT AN IDEMNITY BASIS AS ALLEGED BY THE THE RESPONDENT
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION SEEKS THAT AN ORDER FOR COSTS SHOULD BE ON THE STANDARD COSTS BASIS AND NOT AN IDEMNITY BASIS AS ALLEGED BY THE THE RESPONDENT
MAN FALSELY ACCUSED OF INDECENT ASSUALT SEEKS FOR COSTS ORDER ALLEGING THAT THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ALLEGED OFFENCES CHARGED AGAINST HIM WAS CONDUCTED IN AN UNREASONABLE OR IMPROPER MANNER
MAN FALSELY ACCUSED OF INDECENT ASSUALT SEEKS FOR COSTS ORDER ALLEGING THAT THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE ALLEGED OFFENCES CHARGED AGAINST HIM WAS CONDUCTED IN AN UNREASONABLE OR IMPROPER MANNER
RESOLUTE MINING TEACHES COMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE THE PERILS OF IGNORING CALDERBANK OFFERS
RESOLUTE MINING TEACHES COMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE THE PERILS OF IGNORING CALDERBANK OFFERS
JUDGE SCATHING OF HUSBANDS LAWYERS, BAD AFFIDAVITS, POOR PLEADINGS, COSTS ORDERED IN FAVOR OF WIFE!
JUDGE SCATHING OF HUSBANDS LAWYERS, BAD AFFIDAVITS, POOR PLEADINGS, COSTS ORDERED IN FAVOR OF WIFE!
SSL Certificates